Radiocarbon dating volcanic ash
Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life.
Some so-called creation scientists have attempted to show that radiometric dating does not work on theoretical grounds (for example, Arndts and Overn 1981; Gill 1996) but such attempts invariably have fatal flaws (see Dalrymple 1984; York and Dalrymple 2000).
Although, organic materials as old as 100,000 years potentially can be dated with AMS, dates older than 60,000 years are still rare.
Paleoanthropologists and archaeologists must always be aware of possible radiocarbon sample contamination that could result in inaccurate dates.
As a result, there is a changing ratio of carbon-14 to the more atomically stable carbon-12 involves actually counting individual carbon-14 atoms.
This allows the dating of much older and smaller samples but at a far higher cost.
When odd numbers of electrons are separated, there is a measurable change in the magnetic field (or spin) of the atoms.Since the magnetic field progressively changes with time in a predictable way Whenever possible, paleoanthropologists collect as many dating samples from an ancient human occupation site as possible and employ a variety of chronometric dating methods.In this way, the confidence level of the dating is significantly increased.In the example below, the bone must date to sometime between 1.75 and 1.5 million years ago.For instance, a date of 100,000 5,000 years ago means that there is a high probability the date is in the range of 95,000 and 105,000 years ago and most likely is around 100,000.
Search for radiocarbon dating volcanic ash:
However, paleoanthropologists rarely use it to date sites more than several million years old.